Professor Richard Susskind OBE and Kangaroo courts
click here: Wikepedia - Kangaroo Court
I have been through two litigations:
Lesley McDade v Masons
See below "Mismanagement and Judicial Corruption". Professor Richard Susskind failed to deliver up 40 man hours of investigation material because it related to a "Kangaroo Court" which was the precursor to the litigation which eventually ended up in the House of Lords.
Lesley McDade v S J Berwin & Co, Julian Critchlow, Ian Insley, David Harrell, Nicholas Carnell & Keith Wood
This case took 9 months to return a judgment. Of the very few documents Respondents actually delivered up to the court in a sex discrimination case (because they refused to provide male comparator data or even recognise the male comparator), the performance figures established sex discrimination as definite. (Noticeably, I get paid the most to do the least*). When one of your bosses, Julian Critchlow, has no clients and the other, Nicholas Carnell, cannot win his litigations there is a reason why performance figures are low especially when manipulation of work load, Elie Zekaria, was occurring to enable others to have high performance figures. S J Berwin somehow think a reference in Chambers Directory that Julian Critchlow was a "leading individual" and "thorough" is acceptable when he had no clients. Unfortunately, I did not find it acceptable, hence my second litigation. "The 'shit' case". Yes, there is a litigation about the word "shit". click here: Performance figures of paralegals in the Construction Department of S J Berwin & Co*
* These figures may not be accurate. I hold a document which shows my profit costs for 1997 were £146k and 109% with a charge out rate of £120 per hour. Noticeably no females get articles in this department! My LLB degree is 2:2 Honours
I have been through two litigations:
Lesley McDade v Masons
See below "Mismanagement and Judicial Corruption". Professor Richard Susskind failed to deliver up 40 man hours of investigation material because it related to a "Kangaroo Court" which was the precursor to the litigation which eventually ended up in the House of Lords.
Lesley McDade v S J Berwin & Co, Julian Critchlow, Ian Insley, David Harrell, Nicholas Carnell & Keith Wood
This case took 9 months to return a judgment. Of the very few documents Respondents actually delivered up to the court in a sex discrimination case (because they refused to provide male comparator data or even recognise the male comparator), the performance figures established sex discrimination as definite. (Noticeably, I get paid the most to do the least*). When one of your bosses, Julian Critchlow, has no clients and the other, Nicholas Carnell, cannot win his litigations there is a reason why performance figures are low especially when manipulation of work load, Elie Zekaria, was occurring to enable others to have high performance figures. S J Berwin somehow think a reference in Chambers Directory that Julian Critchlow was a "leading individual" and "thorough" is acceptable when he had no clients. Unfortunately, I did not find it acceptable, hence my second litigation. "The 'shit' case". Yes, there is a litigation about the word "shit". click here: Performance figures of paralegals in the Construction Department of S J Berwin & Co*
* These figures may not be accurate. I hold a document which shows my profit costs for 1997 were £146k and 109% with a charge out rate of £120 per hour. Noticeably no females get articles in this department! My LLB degree is 2:2 Honours
posted by Lesley McDade at 9:05 pm
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home