Legislative reversal - the Jacobites are still on the Statute Books
An interesting article in "The Scotsman" about reversal of historic injustices via the legislature :
The Scotsman 13 July 2009 : "Ye-Jacobites by name lend an ear... age old slur could be a thing of the past" By Tristan Stewart-Robertson (click here)
How many more Statutes are wholly or partly out of date on the premis of being obsolete, requiring amendment, or just plain codified to the 21st Century. I suppose the outcome of the Jacobite rebellion in Scotland in 1745 is well over due.
Act of Settlement anyone ...
Next!!!
Feng Shui the legal system (declutter, mend, aesethetic and move around the Chi to the 21st Century, discard, add something new, reflect, minimalise, reduce - "less is more" no need for compromise in the judiciary or legislature or legal profession!
For example: property law is comprised several statutes - take tenements the solum is jointly owned per block of flats which co-joins other blocks thereby surrounding a collective community of privately owned land. Remove any references to feudalism, ground rents, and take the land out of the block ownership of solum into (a) "residents" of the flats who may be owners or tenants and (b) create one big private garden scoped for multiple uses - children play zone, allotment, tennis court, conservatory/cinema/scrabble-domino/glossies plus coffee morning/clubs - ornithology / philately / arts n' crafts etc and BBQ + shed accessible by all and which could also facilitate low level employment re ground maintenance, child care, elderly care etc thereby realising the community spirit and any issues of isolation and inequality via exclusion, networking, etc. All that needs is the barriers to come down and the land to be owned collectively for "private" land purposes as a garden for the whole zone of the surrounding tenement blocks for "residents", not based on ownership. Some of the tenement backgreens collectively are over or just under an acre of land, highly undeveloped, rarely used and it is possible to be surrounded on all sides of a cultivated area by weeds - albeit the biodiversity includes mature trees, ph-neutral soil to the 18th/19th century or earlier/later, may include rare plant species or none at all, a squirrel. As Ken Livingston said on the Chelsea Flower show - an Oak tree attracts 250 species : there is potentially in excess of 500-1000 homes surrounding tenement private garden space : wholly undervalued and underdeveloped as a city based open green space. The statute legislation - where is it at currently, where should it be politically, what should it being doing for the community and common good thereof in a 21st century sense - we do not need 19th century land rights or values in the 21st century : it is possible to progress society! Legally it is not as simple as just taking down internal boundary walls ...
NOT PROGRESS UPDATE
Master Leslie of the Royal Courts of Justice, London has been repeatedly asked to remove himself from my court case in England because of his lack of impartiality, his complicity with Respondents' solicitors and his involvement in organised crime and corruption therein to include perverting the course of justice and misconduct in public office. He is moreover notified I am experiencing harrassment and intimidation which is escoteric in nature and it is perceived that as a judge he is actively engaged in the activities due to a serious conflict of interest on the case specific to Geoffrey Robertson QC - Doughty Street Chambers and a Mr Michael Ford, Old Square Chambers/ex-academia at Birbeck (somebody moved the employment law exam date without notifying the students! for a reason yet to be established or was it just myself was not notified! or he stalks his students/clients, etc). I did notify the Bar Council by complaint that Mr Ford was stalking with others involved (1997) and he appears to be continuing to do that having evaded and avoided issues, ie economically lying by the appearance of being truthful: it may also be for intellectual espionage or just cowardice: as he was my witness and failed to attend, but bizarrely notified (a) respondents go first and (b) the case will be dealt with from the point of transfer - on Friday before Monday court: 9 pages of pleadings were overruled so as to focus on transfer by the judge in alignment with Respondents' pleading and evidential bundles - but how did he know this and how did I know it was going to be affirmed Monday morning, etc. Unfortunately, he and others appear in with the woodwork at the moment. I have on many occasions notified the Police, who normally fail to deal, albeit it is perceived the Police may be complicit if not making their own enquiries and further enquiries have been requested viz-a-viz (in relation to/concerning) Master Leslie's current letter refusing to remove himself from the case. Who knows where Mr Ford is and what his itinerary is ... according to Respondents' Counsel, Bruce Carr of Devereux Chambers on my first court action against Masons and Professor Richard Susskind OBE, he did - but Geoffrey Robertson QC who also had a Bar Complaint subsequent to my complaint relating to Mr Ford, whilst at Doughty Street Chambers to deliver up itinerary data - failed to do so SO invasion of privacy by barristers is not a human rights issue then - really. Alison "Nosy" Parker is entrapped in the current case paperwork with resultant contempt of court request, Paula Jefferson who is now dealing refuses to engage to explain the apparent conflict of interest issue via her Counsel, Tim Pullen using his Godolphin Chambers address on papers but actually associated with Doughty Street Chambers - should I make another Bar Council complaint to supplement the two SRA complaints re the lawyers who both have requests to be dealt with as contempt of court (my being nice of course)/ rather than perversion of the course of justice and obstruction. Nice no longer. Mr Tim Pullen's conflict of interest has resulted in a serious invasion of my privacy and others: but no-one appears to want to deal with it or be responsible. Why would Master Leslie consider he still has conduct of the case - he is of unsound mind/ill - which requires political democratic process - I have asked my MP to establish the legality / history of removing a judge from the Bench via democratic process - still waiting for the response!! Time of the essence - perhaps a court date after August judicial holiday break might be appropriate - in the meantime : can everyone establish the itinerary of the following:
Mr Michael Ford and a female unknown
Mr Edward Johnson (lawyer - last known Hammond Suddards) same female unknown above
Mr Khaled (Colin) Nasir (lawyer own law firm)
Dr Lindsay Farmer
Dr Matthew Weate
Mr Geoffrey Robertson QC
Ms Alison "NOSY" Parker
Ms Paula Jefferson and anyone from Beachcrofts LLP
Mr Julian Critchlow - Nightmare corporate psychopath - leading individual and thorough but NO CLIENTS * so you moved to PFI - why?
Mr Nicholas Carnell - Worst Nightmare corporate psychopath - holiday lists with no active clientwork * so I worked on £18m Arbitration Sandline via SJB Advocacy Dept: £24b global merger Diaegeo plc via EC Law Dept and seconded to client, and environment department because I was incompetent NOT.
Ms Anne Molyneux - cannot switch on a computer but brings computer related allegations in a specialist computer law firm - doesn't comply with company policy substantively in confidential memo below referred - "blood all over the walls" statement to tea lady - why is that ANNE!
Ms Cathy James - leaves confidential memo in "public" network directory because (a) she is known to be incompetent and (b) is not complying with company policy either AND she has got a loud voice! How loud is loud?
Professor Richard Susskind OBE - pratt, who expects everyone else to be a pratt as well - universal application of your notion of "acting in the best interests ... of YOU, Mason's Equity, Anne Molyneux, Siobhan Cross and Cathy James" but NOT me. Oh and I competently did have confidential directories as per company policy having been on the same training course as Ms James on the same day at the same time and I was the most advanced in using the computer in department including Scott Schedules!, did actually DO the work in the Department, willingly assisted others, but I get sacrificed and organised crime and corruption for 13 years now - I AM NOT CAUSE THEN. LARGE cheque would be nice! I am not the fraud : OR Crime Record Number!! would be good too.
CID Davis is out there in the ether: hopefully his excuse is not he is undercover! for 10 + years.
Now where is the Scottish Secretary these days ... Prime Minister ... Blair's ... Prince Charles ... CSI ... Law n Order.
Please ensure that Mr Michael Ford's itinerary is monitored and if located in Edinburgh that it would be advantagous to let the Edinburgh Police know his whereabouts or Social Work!
Then there is the problem of a few others closer to home : they are inherently societal problems anyway, but somehow they have become my problems partly as a consequence of notifying the judge of my inability to be processed for "incapacity" under the Mental Capacity Act 2005: as NO RIGHT THINKING ENGLISH WOMAN WOULD ACCEPT "PROTECTED PARTY STATUS" UNDER A MENTAL CAPACITY ACT WHEN NOT A PATIENT ... if anyone is to get a jurisprudential hiding it is not me Master Leslie. ORGANISED CRIME ACT OR TERRORISM ACT OR ESPIONAGE OFFICIAL SECRETS (WHICH I AM NOT) MAY BE A REASON FOR "PROTECTED PARTY" STATUS IN LAW - BUT NEVER MENTAL HEALTH. I doubt anyone needs protected party status from my intellect! Literacy as well as professionalism and competency appears at issue: you are supposed to be educated AND trained. I am deemed by Ms Manley Chairperson to have the ability of a practising solicitor - only I have not done the CPE or Bar Exams - bizarre that - you should at least be at my level given papers in your control!
The alternative is that I notify the Police of my whereabouts in conjunction to their whereabouts at all times perhaps via Satelite Tracking or even google street might assist ... so that the Police can ensure covert surveillance of Respondents' solicitors, Counsel, and Respondents and others : the case is known as the "shit" case for a reason ... the inability of the judge to be literate and reason on sound premis wasn't what I had envisaged - Respondents, Solicitors and Counsel : well they are trying to not progress a simple personal injury case for a reason - is that because of organised crime and corruption, solicitors might lose their practising certificate or the cheque's TOO LARGE. CAUSE THEN EFFECT!!! Was there a really serious problem with my contract ..., S J Berwin's defunct employment law department and human rights department and a clean desk policy in HR! - if they can't see anything on their desk it is not happening ... corporate psychopaths that is ...
The Homecoming Gathering is occurring 25/26 July in Edinburgh - Holyrood Park to the Edinburgh Castle esplanade via procession and pageant. The Clan tents are in Holyrood Park and I will pop by the Clan Davidson tent, possibly also Clan Chatten and if I can find Balliol ...
I am also attending the Clan Davidson dinner - anticipating meeting some folks at the Homecoming Gathering - not anticipating Susskind, Farmer, Ford, Leslie, Weate, Molyneux, Cross, James, Robertson, and others - the Clan Motto and my name means "Sapienter si Sincere" : WISELY if sincerely - this lot don't intellectually measure up! Plus the Woolsack still looks "pretty vacant" - politicians are not supposed to have executive powers in the judiciary : judges are supposed to have executive powers in the Cabinet. Happily standing in "virtually"! if you insist on putting information in the public directory of the Justice system.
Ms Jefferson's response is awaited to the civil liberty issue she created in November 2007 - (a) removal of herself and others and Beachcrofts LLP from conduct of the case due to organised crime, corruption and judicial complicity, (b) a large cheque and settlement she is supposed to be "Insurers' solicitors acting for Respondents" OR (c) due process via another judge who is "intelligent" plus prosecution of all that has gone before substantively and via Parliament. It might be historical but we either have a democracy or we don't and we have something else unknown OR there are more than one version of democracy and we need to know which one we are engaged in ...?
The Scotsman 13 July 2009 : "Ye-Jacobites by name lend an ear... age old slur could be a thing of the past" By Tristan Stewart-Robertson (click here)
How many more Statutes are wholly or partly out of date on the premis of being obsolete, requiring amendment, or just plain codified to the 21st Century. I suppose the outcome of the Jacobite rebellion in Scotland in 1745 is well over due.
Act of Settlement anyone ...
Next!!!
Feng Shui the legal system (declutter, mend, aesethetic and move around the Chi to the 21st Century, discard, add something new, reflect, minimalise, reduce - "less is more" no need for compromise in the judiciary or legislature or legal profession!
For example: property law is comprised several statutes - take tenements the solum is jointly owned per block of flats which co-joins other blocks thereby surrounding a collective community of privately owned land. Remove any references to feudalism, ground rents, and take the land out of the block ownership of solum into (a) "residents" of the flats who may be owners or tenants and (b) create one big private garden scoped for multiple uses - children play zone, allotment, tennis court, conservatory/cinema/scrabble-domino/glossies plus coffee morning/clubs - ornithology / philately / arts n' crafts etc and BBQ + shed accessible by all and which could also facilitate low level employment re ground maintenance, child care, elderly care etc thereby realising the community spirit and any issues of isolation and inequality via exclusion, networking, etc. All that needs is the barriers to come down and the land to be owned collectively for "private" land purposes as a garden for the whole zone of the surrounding tenement blocks for "residents", not based on ownership. Some of the tenement backgreens collectively are over or just under an acre of land, highly undeveloped, rarely used and it is possible to be surrounded on all sides of a cultivated area by weeds - albeit the biodiversity includes mature trees, ph-neutral soil to the 18th/19th century or earlier/later, may include rare plant species or none at all, a squirrel. As Ken Livingston said on the Chelsea Flower show - an Oak tree attracts 250 species : there is potentially in excess of 500-1000 homes surrounding tenement private garden space : wholly undervalued and underdeveloped as a city based open green space. The statute legislation - where is it at currently, where should it be politically, what should it being doing for the community and common good thereof in a 21st century sense - we do not need 19th century land rights or values in the 21st century : it is possible to progress society! Legally it is not as simple as just taking down internal boundary walls ...
NOT PROGRESS UPDATE
Master Leslie of the Royal Courts of Justice, London has been repeatedly asked to remove himself from my court case in England because of his lack of impartiality, his complicity with Respondents' solicitors and his involvement in organised crime and corruption therein to include perverting the course of justice and misconduct in public office. He is moreover notified I am experiencing harrassment and intimidation which is escoteric in nature and it is perceived that as a judge he is actively engaged in the activities due to a serious conflict of interest on the case specific to Geoffrey Robertson QC - Doughty Street Chambers and a Mr Michael Ford, Old Square Chambers/ex-academia at Birbeck (somebody moved the employment law exam date without notifying the students! for a reason yet to be established or was it just myself was not notified! or he stalks his students/clients, etc). I did notify the Bar Council by complaint that Mr Ford was stalking with others involved (1997) and he appears to be continuing to do that having evaded and avoided issues, ie economically lying by the appearance of being truthful: it may also be for intellectual espionage or just cowardice: as he was my witness and failed to attend, but bizarrely notified (a) respondents go first and (b) the case will be dealt with from the point of transfer - on Friday before Monday court: 9 pages of pleadings were overruled so as to focus on transfer by the judge in alignment with Respondents' pleading and evidential bundles - but how did he know this and how did I know it was going to be affirmed Monday morning, etc. Unfortunately, he and others appear in with the woodwork at the moment. I have on many occasions notified the Police, who normally fail to deal, albeit it is perceived the Police may be complicit if not making their own enquiries and further enquiries have been requested viz-a-viz (in relation to/concerning) Master Leslie's current letter refusing to remove himself from the case. Who knows where Mr Ford is and what his itinerary is ... according to Respondents' Counsel, Bruce Carr of Devereux Chambers on my first court action against Masons and Professor Richard Susskind OBE, he did - but Geoffrey Robertson QC who also had a Bar Complaint subsequent to my complaint relating to Mr Ford, whilst at Doughty Street Chambers to deliver up itinerary data - failed to do so SO invasion of privacy by barristers is not a human rights issue then - really. Alison "Nosy" Parker is entrapped in the current case paperwork with resultant contempt of court request, Paula Jefferson who is now dealing refuses to engage to explain the apparent conflict of interest issue via her Counsel, Tim Pullen using his Godolphin Chambers address on papers but actually associated with Doughty Street Chambers - should I make another Bar Council complaint to supplement the two SRA complaints re the lawyers who both have requests to be dealt with as contempt of court (my being nice of course)/ rather than perversion of the course of justice and obstruction. Nice no longer. Mr Tim Pullen's conflict of interest has resulted in a serious invasion of my privacy and others: but no-one appears to want to deal with it or be responsible. Why would Master Leslie consider he still has conduct of the case - he is of unsound mind/ill - which requires political democratic process - I have asked my MP to establish the legality / history of removing a judge from the Bench via democratic process - still waiting for the response!! Time of the essence - perhaps a court date after August judicial holiday break might be appropriate - in the meantime : can everyone establish the itinerary of the following:
Mr Michael Ford and a female unknown
Mr Edward Johnson (lawyer - last known Hammond Suddards) same female unknown above
Mr Khaled (Colin) Nasir (lawyer own law firm)
Dr Lindsay Farmer
Dr Matthew Weate
Mr Geoffrey Robertson QC
Ms Alison "NOSY" Parker
Ms Paula Jefferson and anyone from Beachcrofts LLP
Mr Julian Critchlow - Nightmare corporate psychopath - leading individual and thorough but NO CLIENTS * so you moved to PFI - why?
Mr Nicholas Carnell - Worst Nightmare corporate psychopath - holiday lists with no active clientwork * so I worked on £18m Arbitration Sandline via SJB Advocacy Dept: £24b global merger Diaegeo plc via EC Law Dept and seconded to client, and environment department because I was incompetent NOT.
Ms Anne Molyneux - cannot switch on a computer but brings computer related allegations in a specialist computer law firm - doesn't comply with company policy substantively in confidential memo below referred - "blood all over the walls" statement to tea lady - why is that ANNE!
Ms Cathy James - leaves confidential memo in "public" network directory because (a) she is known to be incompetent and (b) is not complying with company policy either AND she has got a loud voice! How loud is loud?
Professor Richard Susskind OBE - pratt, who expects everyone else to be a pratt as well - universal application of your notion of "acting in the best interests ... of YOU, Mason's Equity, Anne Molyneux, Siobhan Cross and Cathy James" but NOT me. Oh and I competently did have confidential directories as per company policy having been on the same training course as Ms James on the same day at the same time and I was the most advanced in using the computer in department including Scott Schedules!, did actually DO the work in the Department, willingly assisted others, but I get sacrificed and organised crime and corruption for 13 years now - I AM NOT CAUSE THEN. LARGE cheque would be nice! I am not the fraud : OR Crime Record Number!! would be good too.
CID Davis is out there in the ether: hopefully his excuse is not he is undercover! for 10 + years.
Now where is the Scottish Secretary these days ... Prime Minister ... Blair's ... Prince Charles ... CSI ... Law n Order.
Please ensure that Mr Michael Ford's itinerary is monitored and if located in Edinburgh that it would be advantagous to let the Edinburgh Police know his whereabouts or Social Work!
Then there is the problem of a few others closer to home : they are inherently societal problems anyway, but somehow they have become my problems partly as a consequence of notifying the judge of my inability to be processed for "incapacity" under the Mental Capacity Act 2005: as NO RIGHT THINKING ENGLISH WOMAN WOULD ACCEPT "PROTECTED PARTY STATUS" UNDER A MENTAL CAPACITY ACT WHEN NOT A PATIENT ... if anyone is to get a jurisprudential hiding it is not me Master Leslie. ORGANISED CRIME ACT OR TERRORISM ACT OR ESPIONAGE OFFICIAL SECRETS (WHICH I AM NOT) MAY BE A REASON FOR "PROTECTED PARTY" STATUS IN LAW - BUT NEVER MENTAL HEALTH. I doubt anyone needs protected party status from my intellect! Literacy as well as professionalism and competency appears at issue: you are supposed to be educated AND trained. I am deemed by Ms Manley Chairperson to have the ability of a practising solicitor - only I have not done the CPE or Bar Exams - bizarre that - you should at least be at my level given papers in your control!
The alternative is that I notify the Police of my whereabouts in conjunction to their whereabouts at all times perhaps via Satelite Tracking or even google street might assist ... so that the Police can ensure covert surveillance of Respondents' solicitors, Counsel, and Respondents and others : the case is known as the "shit" case for a reason ... the inability of the judge to be literate and reason on sound premis wasn't what I had envisaged - Respondents, Solicitors and Counsel : well they are trying to not progress a simple personal injury case for a reason - is that because of organised crime and corruption, solicitors might lose their practising certificate or the cheque's TOO LARGE. CAUSE THEN EFFECT!!! Was there a really serious problem with my contract ..., S J Berwin's defunct employment law department and human rights department and a clean desk policy in HR! - if they can't see anything on their desk it is not happening ... corporate psychopaths that is ...
The Homecoming Gathering is occurring 25/26 July in Edinburgh - Holyrood Park to the Edinburgh Castle esplanade via procession and pageant. The Clan tents are in Holyrood Park and I will pop by the Clan Davidson tent, possibly also Clan Chatten and if I can find Balliol ...
I am also attending the Clan Davidson dinner - anticipating meeting some folks at the Homecoming Gathering - not anticipating Susskind, Farmer, Ford, Leslie, Weate, Molyneux, Cross, James, Robertson, and others - the Clan Motto and my name means "Sapienter si Sincere" : WISELY if sincerely - this lot don't intellectually measure up! Plus the Woolsack still looks "pretty vacant" - politicians are not supposed to have executive powers in the judiciary : judges are supposed to have executive powers in the Cabinet. Happily standing in "virtually"! if you insist on putting information in the public directory of the Justice system.
Ms Jefferson's response is awaited to the civil liberty issue she created in November 2007 - (a) removal of herself and others and Beachcrofts LLP from conduct of the case due to organised crime, corruption and judicial complicity, (b) a large cheque and settlement she is supposed to be "Insurers' solicitors acting for Respondents" OR (c) due process via another judge who is "intelligent" plus prosecution of all that has gone before substantively and via Parliament. It might be historical but we either have a democracy or we don't and we have something else unknown OR there are more than one version of democracy and we need to know which one we are engaged in ...?
posted by Lesley McDade at 8:10 pm
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home