Corruption
On Friday I appeared before a Master of the Royal Courts on the action Lesley McDade v S J Berwin & Co, Julian Critchlow, Nicholas Carnell, Ian Insley.
The Master attempted to persuade me that a piece of statute law was relevant to me. I argued that it was not and gave the Master substantial reasons as to why it was not relevant.
The Master passed to me a piece of paper on which was written the words "no real prospect of success".
He then made an order refusing my application and refusing my right to appeal.
I now have a civil liberty issue in England & Wales as a consequence, but not in Scotland.
The act of passing me a piece of paper with the words above stated, establishes that this Master is corrupt - he cannot know my case has no prospect of success - if he fails to hear it.
I raised specifically with the Master a request for a declaration of his impartiality. I notified him of the reason why that request was necessary. He failed to declare impartiality or deal with the issue at all.
This particular judge has used procedural abuse on my case over a 4 year period.
Some of you met me outside the Courts passing out my blog details. I told the Master I would raise a stink, I suspect that come Monday morning the only thing the Master can do is resign.
I would also notify you that I am aware that my home and family are being monitored and that we are being "listened into" and that it is probably not MI5/MI6. Whilst I have had some fun, I am aware that Professors of Law are involved. I would also confirm that Masons, the law firm is "a sink estate" firm, I would also inform that S J Berwin is a veritable "cesspit". I do not need to lower the esteem of these firms or various legal professionals (not) they are clearly prepared to do so to themselves without any effort on my part. I am aware of who is doing the surveillance, I am also aware my emails are being monitored.
I therefore draw the conclusion that either this particular Master was coerced or ordered to behave in the manner above or that he is difficient in intellect. I consider it is more likely to be the former.
The Master can if he wishes issue me with a contempt of court order and thereby force the issue into the criminal courts, or he can request that the Home Secretary/Police investigate both cases properly.
I will of course give consideration to publishing the documents in the S J Berwin cases x 2 and also publishing the Bar Council complaints. You know who you are - res ipsa locquitor.
Of interest:
(Click Here) List of Documents in the Second Litigation discovered to Respondents' solicitors
(Click Here) List of Documents Respondents' solicitors provided to the court as an "agreed" court bundle (as abstracted)
(Click Here) List of Documents notified to the Court as having been abstracted by Respondents' solicitors which necessitated a "disagreed court bundle" + arguments in equity, ie in the interests of justice, the evidence be allowed to be produced by myself on the second day in court by 10.30 am next day
I did ask Chairperson Ryan for a contempt of court order be made upon Respondents/Respondents' solicitors/Counsel - never happened. Just what could they be trying to hide from the court!!! (I am obviously not trying to hide anything from the judge, and have played fair throughout). Chairperson Ryan subsequently took 9 months to release his Reserved Judgment (with noticeably a 42 day appeal timeframe just in time for "9/11" - was there a subliminal oblique message in there somewhere!
Needless to say, it has come as little / no surprise that Master Leslie has adopted the stance he has: there has to be a reason why the walls click in the living room and the bedroom and I experience "escotericism".
I have now issued appeal proceedings on the Civil Division of the Royal Courts of Justice and am awaiting a sealed copy of the court document. I have also notified the Police. (If anyone has a burning desire to see any of the documents contained in the Schedule of Documents above, please contact me as they are all a matter of public record now, however, I reserve the right to moderate requests, but will not turn down a reasonable request - you may appreciate I have a civil liberty issue (England only) as a consequence of these documents and the conduct of the people therein). The Third Litigation substantially utilises the same evidential data. (The performance figures are published on the Kangaroo Court post below).
Regards.
Lesley
The Master attempted to persuade me that a piece of statute law was relevant to me. I argued that it was not and gave the Master substantial reasons as to why it was not relevant.
The Master passed to me a piece of paper on which was written the words "no real prospect of success".
He then made an order refusing my application and refusing my right to appeal.
I now have a civil liberty issue in England & Wales as a consequence, but not in Scotland.
The act of passing me a piece of paper with the words above stated, establishes that this Master is corrupt - he cannot know my case has no prospect of success - if he fails to hear it.
I raised specifically with the Master a request for a declaration of his impartiality. I notified him of the reason why that request was necessary. He failed to declare impartiality or deal with the issue at all.
This particular judge has used procedural abuse on my case over a 4 year period.
Some of you met me outside the Courts passing out my blog details. I told the Master I would raise a stink, I suspect that come Monday morning the only thing the Master can do is resign.
I would also notify you that I am aware that my home and family are being monitored and that we are being "listened into" and that it is probably not MI5/MI6. Whilst I have had some fun, I am aware that Professors of Law are involved. I would also confirm that Masons, the law firm is "a sink estate" firm, I would also inform that S J Berwin is a veritable "cesspit". I do not need to lower the esteem of these firms or various legal professionals (not) they are clearly prepared to do so to themselves without any effort on my part. I am aware of who is doing the surveillance, I am also aware my emails are being monitored.
I therefore draw the conclusion that either this particular Master was coerced or ordered to behave in the manner above or that he is difficient in intellect. I consider it is more likely to be the former.
The Master can if he wishes issue me with a contempt of court order and thereby force the issue into the criminal courts, or he can request that the Home Secretary/Police investigate both cases properly.
I will of course give consideration to publishing the documents in the S J Berwin cases x 2 and also publishing the Bar Council complaints. You know who you are - res ipsa locquitor.
Of interest:
(Click Here) List of Documents in the Second Litigation discovered to Respondents' solicitors
(Click Here) List of Documents Respondents' solicitors provided to the court as an "agreed" court bundle (as abstracted)
(Click Here) List of Documents notified to the Court as having been abstracted by Respondents' solicitors which necessitated a "disagreed court bundle" + arguments in equity, ie in the interests of justice, the evidence be allowed to be produced by myself on the second day in court by 10.30 am next day
I did ask Chairperson Ryan for a contempt of court order be made upon Respondents/Respondents' solicitors/Counsel - never happened. Just what could they be trying to hide from the court!!! (I am obviously not trying to hide anything from the judge, and have played fair throughout). Chairperson Ryan subsequently took 9 months to release his Reserved Judgment (with noticeably a 42 day appeal timeframe just in time for "9/11" - was there a subliminal oblique message in there somewhere!
Needless to say, it has come as little / no surprise that Master Leslie has adopted the stance he has: there has to be a reason why the walls click in the living room and the bedroom and I experience "escotericism".
I have now issued appeal proceedings on the Civil Division of the Royal Courts of Justice and am awaiting a sealed copy of the court document. I have also notified the Police. (If anyone has a burning desire to see any of the documents contained in the Schedule of Documents above, please contact me as they are all a matter of public record now, however, I reserve the right to moderate requests, but will not turn down a reasonable request - you may appreciate I have a civil liberty issue (England only) as a consequence of these documents and the conduct of the people therein). The Third Litigation substantially utilises the same evidential data. (The performance figures are published on the Kangaroo Court post below).
Regards.
Lesley
posted by Lesley McDade at 9:18 am
4 Comments:
you are obviously mentally ill
Lord Woolf
I am obviously exceptionally intelligent. If I had not issued the Writs in the Masons and S J Berwin & Co and others litigations x 2 I would have experienced "inequality" which is a subjective criteria per se as to not participate in equality would be self defeatest and I do not see why I should not participate in society whether it be a justice system or a government consultation paper or by ballot box such that I may impact on the outcome. However, the real issue having issued the writ(s) is that I have been treated on an "unequal" basis - not because I am not competent to litigate (I have 20 years legal experience and an Honours LLB Degree in English law), but because the judiciary have been in my case "perverse/corrupt" as conduct has been deliberate [see the EAT appeal doc and state clearly where it is contained in judgment]. However, a judge can also be bias/prejudiced which may be deliberate or inadvertent - passing me a piece of paper stating "no prospect of success" is clearly deficient especially in light of the fundamental need for the HRA 1998 and article 6 subsequent to your reforms which I became aware of via dissertation in 1996/7 and which I had also written on as an essay in 1993/4. My circumstances are "engineered"/"concerted"/"orchestrated" - if you could only see the papers. The issue therefore remains that as a Law Lord and having sat on the highest bench in the land, how you logically, deductively, analytically, inductively or even hypothetically managed to be a judge who advocated NOT using a judicial system - if you wanted to be a mediator - feel free, but if your function in society is to judge then I am entitled to issue a writ and expect that to happen. As I am entitled to "equality before the law" from the point of issue of writ, which encapsulates the procedure as well as the substantive, perhaps you need to accept that you are "deficient" and recognise that I am experiencing "unequal" treatment as a consequence of the impact of your reforms - I do wonder if there is a judge able to be intelligent in the 21st Century in Europe! Bizarrely, the Master in question has been repeatedly informed by the Official Solicitor for England & Wales that she cannot act because the law does not apply to me and she subsequently got promoted even citing the Woolf reforms was the issue - it clearly is not me that is the problem. I am going to have to appeal - please ensure your sidekick and his mafia gets real. (Unfortunately I am writing this on the presumption that you are Lord Woolf and not a manifestation representing so - I will try clicking on your image to verify the same). The Master was provided a set of papers which he subsequently claimed went missing from his chamber, he was provided a bundle copied to the OS referred above which he promptly handed to Respondents. He has never therefore actually read the case papers so passing a paper signed and dated with the representation above is clearly "Corruption". Needless to say, Respondents are having a real difficulty in complying with your CPR Rule 1 - but they may do so if I publish the papers and everyone else can read them too. Evidence, evidence, evidence - there is an abundance but no one appears to be able to read!
Lord Woolf
To clarify, I am on no prescribed medication for any condition or under Mental Health legislation in Scotland. Nor do I receive any care under legislation in Scotland for mental disability. I also work for 4 organisations in Scotland which means I can actually do approximately 40 sometimes upto 80 hours a week for these organisations, there is therefore no issue of incapacity. Being "unequal" is the issue as is the impact on my lifestyle and life choices through the obvious difficiency of yourself and others within the legal, judicial and political professions and their ancillar agency: bias / prejudice is evidential certain as establishing itself as perversion of the course of justice and corruption as opposed to abuse of human rights via article 6.
Dear Dickie
Thanks for the offer, unfortunately, sport is not my area of knowledge albeit sports law has become quite developed over the last 10 years or so and would be an interesting area to delve into for documentary coverage (the fundamental rules of contract and tort are probably just the same regardless of the sport) - I have just googled the Law Society to see if an ex-colleague is still practising as he was interested in sports law and he is not coming up - Sports law is not a category but probably falls within "Media and Entertainment": if you google the Law Society website you should be able to come up with some high flyers in this area. It is probably quite a niche area now and if you ask around a few sports coaches people will have an idea of who's who in this field. For what its worth I played in the Edinburgh and London Solicitors Hockey League but am not club class - I would have difficulty referreeing a draughts game - Marquis of Queensberry Rules aside (and Lord Woolf might take a look (one black eye coming up) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marquess_of_Queensberry_rules). Also I cannot practise law and give legal advice without supervision and guidance of a lawyer as I have not done the CPE or the Bar Exams - which would defeat your purpose. Anyway thanks for the consideration.
Regards.
Lesley
PS I did do some work on a Belgian Grand Prix Driver's case many years ago - I wonder what happened to him!!
Post a Comment
<< Home