Light
There have been some interesting issues surfacing over several months now, and as we all know "the truth always surfaces" especially when there is "light" on the subject. Darkness is where corruption and organised crime dwell and the sooner the light of day is on the issue, the better for everyone. In this post, I am going to focus on light but from a religious perspective and I anticipate my efforts will not be offensive or too offensive and that they will be taken in the spirit of their intention - light.
First Issue: Christianity
The Head of the Catholic Church is Pope Ratzinger - he was recently denouced in relation to Nazism and found to be involved in the Hitler Youth movement as a young person. The interesting issue is that the Catholic Church appeared to me to have appointed Pope Ratzinger specifically concerning his nazi association (for which my perception is relative to "compromise" in legal systems across the globe and integrated into the UK in 1999 via the Woolf Reforms which I perceive to be nazi in orientation - why do we need a Human Rights Act 1998 in the UK? when our legal system provides "equality" (fairness, impartiality and justice) before the law and any issue would be a crime relative to perversion of the course of justice rather than a civil HRA issue! (But then we also got "contemporary equality", proportionality, expedition and economy via Woolf/Jews) - rather than the Pope's spiritual being. Whether there is truth in the issue requires investigation from the Church but he did not resign indicating that whilst he has this historic issue his spirituality is not at issue.
A universal truth held by Catholics - no matter how bad someone is, they cannot eradicate good.
Daily Mail article 20/10/08 "Row erupts out after Israel's ruling party issues picture of Pope in Nazi uniform" (click here)
However, in today's Daily Mail there is an article based on several articles relevant to Pope Pius XII
Daily Mail article 17/08/09 "Vatican plan to honour wartime Pope Pius XII would be 'severe blow to Catholic-Jewish relations" (click here)
Second Issue : Judaism
The Daily Mail article above is informative from the perspective "where was the Jewish resistence" in WWII. We have the French Resistence and my French teacher Madam MacFarlane put her hand up to being involved, resistence from other countries and it would appear resistance via Catholics and Pope Pius XII. Our school history lessons in the UK, and I attended a Scottish Academy for my secondary education, fails to document Jewish resistence, in any depth. Given my court action below, even I sent the judge on my case a letter informing him he is the "village idiot" and I am refusing to comply with his nonsensical order so why would Jewish people go into concentration camps and gas chambers without any appearance of resistance from themselves or their kind. I need to put this into a hypothesis : did the Jews "cause" WWII and therefore accepted they needed to sacrifice their own kind in this way (possibly escoteric command) - the issue being a 6 million sacrifice for themselves but an even greater world sacrifice of others, ie an indirect issue. Given my court case and the extent of the detrious I am experiencing from a Jewish law firm (S J Berwin & Co and others) (and I have worked for many Jewish law firms and never been treated in this manner) - which also had a Human Rights Department and Employment Department to which I attended a whistleblowing lecture and duly whistleblew and regularly complained concerning treatment to HR - I find it unacceptable that the Jewish people use the "holocaust" PR to make Jewish people look almost lilly white as a race, when I have been in the courts for 13 years and my dissertation exposed a fundamental flaw in a top Law Report in England - the Woolf Reforms : my concerns are justified given CPR Rule 1 exists in the court process.
Third Issue : Muslim
The news last week informed that a Muslim wedding had become the centre of a PR event as a politician had used his invitation to do "political" rather than "social" engineering. Yes, I agree that where men and women are segrated on religious grounds concerning the Muslim religion that any other religion does not need to comply and that on the premis of equality an area for non-muslim people wishing to not be segretated should exist in Muslim settings. This may be something that could usefully be discussed by the Muslim Council as an improvement in interfaith relations - it may already exist. However, even I found it offensive that a politician would hijack a persons wedding for political gain.
Well I have gone this far, might as well raise the bar a little further - the Muslim religion was reported recently in the UK on the premis of public executions and I have also read stories relating to stoning. The issue appears to me to be that these are very primative ways to do justice in the 21st century. There is room for improvement. Hypothesising again, the US can also be seen to be out of cinq concerning Death Row inmates who can get the electric chair or a lethal injection. There are states in America who do not accept this as a satisfactory measure to deal with Justice of serious violent criminals. In the 21st Century using technology it would be possible to log all of the statutory crime and case precendent crime State by State and to come up with a "uniform" - "United States" of America legal system. That would create much change but such a system would enable a complete codification exercise to a 21st Century level of law and standard in the global world. The Statutory Crime itself would highlight State by State what is "prohibited" in X state but "permitted" in Y state. They may be doing this already: and joined-up legislation is probably a good thing in itself (per se). Bear in mind that the United States is completely dissimilar from the European Union which has "member states" which I particuarly find annoying when we are really "member countries". In the European model - a "regulation" impacts across all member states uniformly in law - something that may be worth noticing in a "Dis-united States of American legal system".
Lastly:
I was watching a documentary on TV last Saturday on Sir Isaac Newton who attended Cambridge University. He allegedly plagiarised another persons work in accurately determining his own scientific material in relation to "light" studies. I found the documentary interesting especially the issue of the lack of knowledge of Sir Isaac Newton per se in his own experiments which indicated to my mind that he was indeed guilty of plagiarism - as there is a gap in his knowledge - which could only have come from someone else's work - Professor Robert Hooke, a poor students, work. That Professor Hooke was expunged from most of history only establishes Sir Isaac Newton's guilt - he would not have done so for no reason. What is more important is how the Royal Society or other sources, possibly Cambridge engaged in expunging Professor Hooke from history, ie the power behind the man.
Wikipedia on Sir Isaac Newton (click here)
A thought: Queen Deborgilla of Galloway of Scotland created Oxford University for the poor and gifted students, hence you have Balliol College, Oxford. King John Balliol was King of Scotland1292-1308. I have a pedigree 1221 showing that King John Balliol's daughter Ellin married a Knight, Sir William Jermy. The Jermy family were knighted from the 12th Century to the 17th Century.
Sir John Jermy
Sir William Jermy m Ellin Balliol, King John Balliol's daughter
Sir John Jermy
Sir Thomas Jermy
Sir William Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir Thomas Jermy
Sir Isaac Jermy
There appears to be little or no history concerning Ellin Balliol or the Jermy knighted line - has it been expunged!!!
Aung San Suu Kyi : Our Prime Minister appears happy to send Birthday Cards in support of her cause in relation to politics in Burma and she is a beacon of hope and resistence for the oppressed and currently is deemed to have violated her house arrest. As you may or may not be aware, my grandfather Kenneth Jermy fought the Japanese in Burma in WWII. Given my 13 year trog in the British courts - I am wondering do I get a birthday card next year from the Guinness Book of Records or the Prime Minister who is abundently aware of the issues concerning my case ... I would prefer the arrest of Professor Richard Susskind, John Bishop, Anthony Bunch, Neil Biggs, Mike Orton, Anne Molyneux, Siobhan Cross and Cathy James possibly Brian Gegg to include Bruce Carr, Michael Ford, Sean Brannigan, Jeremy McMullen QC and Geoffrey Roberson QC (Carr / Ford using McMullen as intemediary) : Case 1 - Julian Critchlow, Nicholas Carnell, Ian Insley, David Harrell, Keith Wood and legal team Marie Van Der Zyl, Susan Kelly, Paula Jefferson and Alison Parker, Tim Pullen (Counsel/Geoffrey Robertson QC - Ford/Farmer/Weait/Lacey ex-Birbeck academia : Cases 2 and 3 and all judicial members for (a) perversion of the course of justice, (b) misconduct in public office including conspiracy and complicity to DO so, the issues are escalating, I am experiencing harrassment and intimidation on case 3 to include trespass, invasion of privacy, assault and esoteric assault and there are more people getting involved in criminality re respondents and others - where it would be more appropriate to liaise with Police and/or myself directly: I am happy to permit inspection of documents upon request or you can utilise the "publicity of the courts" - my pleading and evidential bundles are in!
First Issue: Christianity
The Head of the Catholic Church is Pope Ratzinger - he was recently denouced in relation to Nazism and found to be involved in the Hitler Youth movement as a young person. The interesting issue is that the Catholic Church appeared to me to have appointed Pope Ratzinger specifically concerning his nazi association (for which my perception is relative to "compromise" in legal systems across the globe and integrated into the UK in 1999 via the Woolf Reforms which I perceive to be nazi in orientation - why do we need a Human Rights Act 1998 in the UK? when our legal system provides "equality" (fairness, impartiality and justice) before the law and any issue would be a crime relative to perversion of the course of justice rather than a civil HRA issue! (But then we also got "contemporary equality", proportionality, expedition and economy via Woolf/Jews) - rather than the Pope's spiritual being. Whether there is truth in the issue requires investigation from the Church but he did not resign indicating that whilst he has this historic issue his spirituality is not at issue.
A universal truth held by Catholics - no matter how bad someone is, they cannot eradicate good.
Daily Mail article 20/10/08 "Row erupts out after Israel's ruling party issues picture of Pope in Nazi uniform" (click here)
However, in today's Daily Mail there is an article based on several articles relevant to Pope Pius XII
Daily Mail article 17/08/09 "Vatican plan to honour wartime Pope Pius XII would be 'severe blow to Catholic-Jewish relations" (click here)
Second Issue : Judaism
The Daily Mail article above is informative from the perspective "where was the Jewish resistence" in WWII. We have the French Resistence and my French teacher Madam MacFarlane put her hand up to being involved, resistence from other countries and it would appear resistance via Catholics and Pope Pius XII. Our school history lessons in the UK, and I attended a Scottish Academy for my secondary education, fails to document Jewish resistence, in any depth. Given my court action below, even I sent the judge on my case a letter informing him he is the "village idiot" and I am refusing to comply with his nonsensical order so why would Jewish people go into concentration camps and gas chambers without any appearance of resistance from themselves or their kind. I need to put this into a hypothesis : did the Jews "cause" WWII and therefore accepted they needed to sacrifice their own kind in this way (possibly escoteric command) - the issue being a 6 million sacrifice for themselves but an even greater world sacrifice of others, ie an indirect issue. Given my court case and the extent of the detrious I am experiencing from a Jewish law firm (S J Berwin & Co and others) (and I have worked for many Jewish law firms and never been treated in this manner) - which also had a Human Rights Department and Employment Department to which I attended a whistleblowing lecture and duly whistleblew and regularly complained concerning treatment to HR - I find it unacceptable that the Jewish people use the "holocaust" PR to make Jewish people look almost lilly white as a race, when I have been in the courts for 13 years and my dissertation exposed a fundamental flaw in a top Law Report in England - the Woolf Reforms : my concerns are justified given CPR Rule 1 exists in the court process.
Third Issue : Muslim
The news last week informed that a Muslim wedding had become the centre of a PR event as a politician had used his invitation to do "political" rather than "social" engineering. Yes, I agree that where men and women are segrated on religious grounds concerning the Muslim religion that any other religion does not need to comply and that on the premis of equality an area for non-muslim people wishing to not be segretated should exist in Muslim settings. This may be something that could usefully be discussed by the Muslim Council as an improvement in interfaith relations - it may already exist. However, even I found it offensive that a politician would hijack a persons wedding for political gain.
Well I have gone this far, might as well raise the bar a little further - the Muslim religion was reported recently in the UK on the premis of public executions and I have also read stories relating to stoning. The issue appears to me to be that these are very primative ways to do justice in the 21st century. There is room for improvement. Hypothesising again, the US can also be seen to be out of cinq concerning Death Row inmates who can get the electric chair or a lethal injection. There are states in America who do not accept this as a satisfactory measure to deal with Justice of serious violent criminals. In the 21st Century using technology it would be possible to log all of the statutory crime and case precendent crime State by State and to come up with a "uniform" - "United States" of America legal system. That would create much change but such a system would enable a complete codification exercise to a 21st Century level of law and standard in the global world. The Statutory Crime itself would highlight State by State what is "prohibited" in X state but "permitted" in Y state. They may be doing this already: and joined-up legislation is probably a good thing in itself (per se). Bear in mind that the United States is completely dissimilar from the European Union which has "member states" which I particuarly find annoying when we are really "member countries". In the European model - a "regulation" impacts across all member states uniformly in law - something that may be worth noticing in a "Dis-united States of American legal system".
Lastly:
I was watching a documentary on TV last Saturday on Sir Isaac Newton who attended Cambridge University. He allegedly plagiarised another persons work in accurately determining his own scientific material in relation to "light" studies. I found the documentary interesting especially the issue of the lack of knowledge of Sir Isaac Newton per se in his own experiments which indicated to my mind that he was indeed guilty of plagiarism - as there is a gap in his knowledge - which could only have come from someone else's work - Professor Robert Hooke, a poor students, work. That Professor Hooke was expunged from most of history only establishes Sir Isaac Newton's guilt - he would not have done so for no reason. What is more important is how the Royal Society or other sources, possibly Cambridge engaged in expunging Professor Hooke from history, ie the power behind the man.
Wikipedia on Sir Isaac Newton (click here)
A thought: Queen Deborgilla of Galloway of Scotland created Oxford University for the poor and gifted students, hence you have Balliol College, Oxford. King John Balliol was King of Scotland1292-1308. I have a pedigree 1221 showing that King John Balliol's daughter Ellin married a Knight, Sir William Jermy. The Jermy family were knighted from the 12th Century to the 17th Century.
Sir John Jermy
Sir William Jermy m Ellin Balliol, King John Balliol's daughter
Sir John Jermy
Sir Thomas Jermy
Sir William Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir Thomas Jermy
Sir Isaac Jermy
There appears to be little or no history concerning Ellin Balliol or the Jermy knighted line - has it been expunged!!!
Aung San Suu Kyi : Our Prime Minister appears happy to send Birthday Cards in support of her cause in relation to politics in Burma and she is a beacon of hope and resistence for the oppressed and currently is deemed to have violated her house arrest. As you may or may not be aware, my grandfather Kenneth Jermy fought the Japanese in Burma in WWII. Given my 13 year trog in the British courts - I am wondering do I get a birthday card next year from the Guinness Book of Records or the Prime Minister who is abundently aware of the issues concerning my case ... I would prefer the arrest of Professor Richard Susskind, John Bishop, Anthony Bunch, Neil Biggs, Mike Orton, Anne Molyneux, Siobhan Cross and Cathy James possibly Brian Gegg to include Bruce Carr, Michael Ford, Sean Brannigan, Jeremy McMullen QC and Geoffrey Roberson QC (Carr / Ford using McMullen as intemediary) : Case 1 - Julian Critchlow, Nicholas Carnell, Ian Insley, David Harrell, Keith Wood and legal team Marie Van Der Zyl, Susan Kelly, Paula Jefferson and Alison Parker, Tim Pullen (Counsel/Geoffrey Robertson QC - Ford/Farmer/Weait/Lacey ex-Birbeck academia : Cases 2 and 3 and all judicial members for (a) perversion of the course of justice, (b) misconduct in public office including conspiracy and complicity to DO so, the issues are escalating, I am experiencing harrassment and intimidation on case 3 to include trespass, invasion of privacy, assault and esoteric assault and there are more people getting involved in criminality re respondents and others - where it would be more appropriate to liaise with Police and/or myself directly: I am happy to permit inspection of documents upon request or you can utilise the "publicity of the courts" - my pleading and evidential bundles are in!
posted by Lesley McDade at 4:53 pm
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home