Unilateralism - Bilateralism - Mulitilaterlism
There are several "isms", along with "icity", "ness" and "less" that are add on to words that give them the appearance of importance.
For example "reciprocity", "timelessness" and "unilaterilism".
I see Gordon Brown MP did back the war in Iraq and I had for some time been under the illusion that he was behind Clare Short ex-MP's stance or supportive of it in any event.
I remember the newspapers reporting on Iraq as I was most concerned and alarmed that we had entered an "unjust war" due to my research papers on ADR entering England via the Woolf Reforms, then Scotland (and anyone who thinks Woolf did not get into the Gill Report is mistaken), and Europe via Arlene McCarthy MEP's anti-democratic processing of the Consultation Paper on the Subsidiarity Principle in relation to the Directive on Mediation - only 2 of 27 published responses were considered along with 5 experts she calls expert but I do not. She refused to interview me with the "competition model" which is correctly aligned to European methodology!
The term "unilaterlism" arose pre invasion because America with the support of the UK did not wait for the UN to decide upon the resolution debacle and went alone on the WMD sticky whicket.
In any event, Gordon Brown PM's current statements only digs an even deeper hole - it was for the UN to decide the outcome of their imposed resolutions, not America or the UK - why else have a UN if it is without merit or defunct of purpose.
Hans Blix report needed to be completed, that would have dealt with any intelligence issues and would have assisted Saddam Hussein and the people of Iraq as well. I am not trying to defend Saddam Hussein but there was in place a process, he was complying to some degree, but he had a battle on two camps - America chomping at the bit for war and the UN attempting peace and diplomacy - who was the bigger threat: you cannot expect a country and its people to always do the right thing, or the best thing ... but you can expect those who are posing a threat to be reined in and by their own intelligence services or the authority that is put in place, in this case the UN.
Bilaterlism and multilateralism would have been more expedient and that is why we sign up to Treaties, contracts, comply with obligations and the UN and other agencies NATO being another.
In hindsight it was a mess, it was deliberately designed to be a mess, that is why it is "unjust".
I was subject to a "unilateral" command many years ago - 16 to be precis, a life sentence - because a Professor of Law and Philosophy, did not engage brain and got his ass whipped by a legal secretary in a disciplinary appeal hearing - Cathy James has got a loud voice - when is Professor Susskind going to take responsibility for his actions whilst working for the law firm Masons, who have also not taken responsibility for Anne Molyneux and Siobhan Cross bringing computer related allegations in a specialist IT technology law firm, neither the Law Society, Bar Council or Judicial Complaints.
However, the act of "unilaterilism" that I was subjected to was "unlawful" in relation to my bilaterally signed contract. On appeal before Mr Justice Morison, there is no case precedent in judgment as the firm having gone down the route of corruption needed to hide their original case citation in relation to the ultra vires doctrine, ie outwith the scope of ... the contract which was a private law contract, had it been a public law contract they would have perhaps got away with it.
Notice the similarities to Iraq. Unilaterlism and America and the UK's operating outwith the scope of the UN resolution TOO! making the act of war "unlawful" or as is called in Jurisprudence "UNJUST". Why was Lord Goldsmith persuaded ... who did the lobbying ...?
But there are more issues, my LLB degree was graded 2:2 HONS - I received honours because of my dissertation which I had to argue against policy to do and succeeded. My dissertation was contrary to the Woolf Report and subsequently the Access to Justice Act 1999 - it had comprised within it Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). It is a Japanese concept used culturally within Japan. The version we got was American Jewish albeit Lord Mackay of Clashfern originally tried to bring it in when he was Master of the Rolls (or perhaps Lord Chancellor), ie Scottish.
Therefore, I find I am suing the IT Adviser to the Lord Chief Justice, Professor Susskind, and I am exposing academically the top law report in England, the Woolf Report by Lord Woolf, the Lord Chief Justice. Oops!
You have in England/UK
The Queen
The Prime Minister
The Lord Chancellor (now Justice Secretary)
The Lord Chief Justice
The Vice Chancellor
The Master of the Rolls
Oops
Makes me a little bit special given I was originally a legal secretary of 17 years duration in Scotland and England, and then a fee earner paralegal of 3 years duration in S J Berwin & Co - where you get pay rises for doing no work, but no pay rise if your performance is 109% and profit costs £146k on a £120.00 charge out rate! That's Jewish for you! No something more sinister was occurring - Professor Richard Susskind's long corrupt arm of the law, which I can prove to a degree.
So now that Lord Woolf is outed and Professor Susskind is outed - what did the judiciary in England, or Scotland or Europe need with ADR in the judicial system and legal profession - what was necessary to be HIDDEN, or COVERED-UP - Justice is "PUBLIC", even arbitration still applies the rule of law privately!
WE WERE INVADED by a Japanese concept but directionally formulating from America and the Jewish people assisted by the Scots or is it vice versa!
Professor Richard Susskind OBE ("Professor DISobeDIENT") is Scottish. But he mistakenly believes that I am also Scottish, I was born in England, but have a Scottish accent and Scottish Father, William McDade.
Oops!
I have been covered up for 16 years for some reason: the judiciary and legal profession are knocked over, the Press - spin and are knocked over too, the military are knocked over - because I believe Iraq is a decoy because my research was known by 1997 and definitely by 1998/1999/2000/2001/2002 yet never made headlines - Professor Susskind holds public office, should have made front page when there is certain corruption in the Ministry of Justice or Lord Chancellor's Office - Lord Derry Irvine of Lairg did get sacked - why? Finally, awash with money and Clinton trips the financial sector finally goes down when Greenspan hits the shores of the UK - be it for good or bad reason: it was a short trip in any event, did not make for splash headlines, too quiet given he was head of the Federal Bank of America - did he stop for the lecture circuit!
Back to Scottish issues - this is a shocker:
(Taken from the backpage of a Historic Scotland publication Kings and Queens of Scotland by Colin Baxter)
*
Alpin
Kenneth I (843-859)
Constantin I (863-877)
Donald II (889-900)
Malcolm I (942-954)
Kenneth II ((971-995)
Malcolm II (1005-1034)
Bethoc
Duncan I (1034-1040)
Malcolm III (1058-1093)
David I (1124-1153)
Earl Henry
David
Margaret --------------and Isabella
Devorgilla -----------------Robert de Brus "The Competitor"
John Balliol (1292-1296) --Robert de Brus
Edward Balliol -----------Robert I (1306-1329) "The Bruce
--------------------------Marjorie
--------------------------Robert II (1371-1390)
--------------------------Robert III (1390-1406)
--------------------------James I (1406-1437)
--------------------------James II (1437-1460)
--------------------------James III (1460-1488)
--------------------------James IV (1488-1513)
--------------------------James V (1513-1542)
--------------------------Mary Queen of Scots (1542-1567)
--------------------------James VI and I (1567-1625)
--------------------------Charles I (1625-1649)
---------------Charles II (1649-85) and James VII & II (1685-89)
---------------------!--------------------------!
---------------William III (1689-1702)and Mary II ((1689-94)
(*this is a pedigree line for Balliol only)
The family of "Jermy" of Norfolk, England have a Pedigree from 1221 which establishes the family as "knights" from the 12th Century to the 17th Century.
Sir William Jermy 1221
Sir John Jermy m Marjery daughter of Roger Bigot Earl Marshall of England and his daughter married Thomas Bretherton son of Edward I
Sir John Jermy
Sir William Jermy married Ellin, daughter of King John Balliol, King of Scotland (1292-1306)
Sir John Jermy
Sir Thomas Jermy
Sir William Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir Isaac Jermy
Sir Thomas Jermy
That is the Pedegree of the Scots but Queen Devorgilla of Galloway created "OXFORD UNIVERSITY" for the poor student - a veritable "Rose". King John Balliol was called "tomb tabard" or "empty surcoat". Was he defamed? Was Isabella green because her line did not succeed, but eventually did so via Robert The Bruce? Ellin was married to a Knight not a Royal House of Europe, she may have been furious and probably assisted the English King Edward II. Edward I had 20 children, Thomas Bretherton was the 17th child or brother No 2. Bizarrely, if you look at the Clan Crest Badges for Scotland, there is none for Canmore or Balliol, 13 challenged for the Crown under David I, but I do not know who the others were, but John Balliol was chosen over Robert the Brus (grandfather). It was whittled down to 6 of which Canmore, Bruce, Balliol were the top three. Balliol got it because Margaret was the oldest daughter. Isabella and Robert de Brus did they set out to defame Balliol - why is he empty surcoat?. Certainly the Clan badges do not form history of Scotland for Balliol AND Canmore (bizarrely) on modern maps !! (what was the Canmore issue), and the others? nor is there reference to a tartan for Canmore or Balliol in ancestry books on tartans at least none I am looking at?
Is this a real 12th Century Da Vinci Code?
My mother's name is Lesley Diane Jermy, she has a copy of the Jermy Pedegree only 300 were made - we know little else than that other than the Jermy lands were subject to an issue in Chancery by a bent judge who managed to secure them in the 17/18th centuries. The brief history of The Jermy Family of Norfolk and Suffolk shows the clan badge as a Griffen atop a helmet and shield with the lion rampart guardant with the message underneath "splendidum virtus insigne" on a ribbon. The book claims that all Jermy's of Norfolk are descendents and my mum was born in Norfolk. Amateur genealogy has thrown up a conundrum in the 17th century but .... I would like to know! Invitations to assist from historians with nothing to do OR perhaps a history graduate from Edinburgh University who may be out of a job soon!
Is this another "oops" which is causing a cover up of my court actions - technically I am English but have I been helping the wrong side.
Lord Mackay of Clashfern left comments on Hansard 18 December 1998 informing that history was being made: law is being made from the "Despatch Box" not the Woolsack. The issue is that the Queen enacted the Access to Justice Act 1999 BUT it does the opposite - Access from Justice. Moreover, the Masons/Susskind case and SJ Berwin & others cases going through the courts establishes the methodology:
law is not applied
law that is not applicable is applied
I await law is applied - I wrote to the courts yesterday again - they're not going to be ecstatic!
Concerning the Chilcot Inquiry my documents are ready to be inspected (a) history of the Woolf Reforms to the present day (b) legal cases for methodology not substance.
The Scotsman article on 19/02/10 by Eddie Barnes entitled "Gordon Brown: Saddam's defiance was real cause of Iraq War (Click Here)
For example "reciprocity", "timelessness" and "unilaterilism".
I see Gordon Brown MP did back the war in Iraq and I had for some time been under the illusion that he was behind Clare Short ex-MP's stance or supportive of it in any event.
I remember the newspapers reporting on Iraq as I was most concerned and alarmed that we had entered an "unjust war" due to my research papers on ADR entering England via the Woolf Reforms, then Scotland (and anyone who thinks Woolf did not get into the Gill Report is mistaken), and Europe via Arlene McCarthy MEP's anti-democratic processing of the Consultation Paper on the Subsidiarity Principle in relation to the Directive on Mediation - only 2 of 27 published responses were considered along with 5 experts she calls expert but I do not. She refused to interview me with the "competition model" which is correctly aligned to European methodology!
The term "unilaterlism" arose pre invasion because America with the support of the UK did not wait for the UN to decide upon the resolution debacle and went alone on the WMD sticky whicket.
In any event, Gordon Brown PM's current statements only digs an even deeper hole - it was for the UN to decide the outcome of their imposed resolutions, not America or the UK - why else have a UN if it is without merit or defunct of purpose.
Hans Blix report needed to be completed, that would have dealt with any intelligence issues and would have assisted Saddam Hussein and the people of Iraq as well. I am not trying to defend Saddam Hussein but there was in place a process, he was complying to some degree, but he had a battle on two camps - America chomping at the bit for war and the UN attempting peace and diplomacy - who was the bigger threat: you cannot expect a country and its people to always do the right thing, or the best thing ... but you can expect those who are posing a threat to be reined in and by their own intelligence services or the authority that is put in place, in this case the UN.
Bilaterlism and multilateralism would have been more expedient and that is why we sign up to Treaties, contracts, comply with obligations and the UN and other agencies NATO being another.
In hindsight it was a mess, it was deliberately designed to be a mess, that is why it is "unjust".
I was subject to a "unilateral" command many years ago - 16 to be precis, a life sentence - because a Professor of Law and Philosophy, did not engage brain and got his ass whipped by a legal secretary in a disciplinary appeal hearing - Cathy James has got a loud voice - when is Professor Susskind going to take responsibility for his actions whilst working for the law firm Masons, who have also not taken responsibility for Anne Molyneux and Siobhan Cross bringing computer related allegations in a specialist IT technology law firm, neither the Law Society, Bar Council or Judicial Complaints.
However, the act of "unilaterilism" that I was subjected to was "unlawful" in relation to my bilaterally signed contract. On appeal before Mr Justice Morison, there is no case precedent in judgment as the firm having gone down the route of corruption needed to hide their original case citation in relation to the ultra vires doctrine, ie outwith the scope of ... the contract which was a private law contract, had it been a public law contract they would have perhaps got away with it.
Notice the similarities to Iraq. Unilaterlism and America and the UK's operating outwith the scope of the UN resolution TOO! making the act of war "unlawful" or as is called in Jurisprudence "UNJUST". Why was Lord Goldsmith persuaded ... who did the lobbying ...?
But there are more issues, my LLB degree was graded 2:2 HONS - I received honours because of my dissertation which I had to argue against policy to do and succeeded. My dissertation was contrary to the Woolf Report and subsequently the Access to Justice Act 1999 - it had comprised within it Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). It is a Japanese concept used culturally within Japan. The version we got was American Jewish albeit Lord Mackay of Clashfern originally tried to bring it in when he was Master of the Rolls (or perhaps Lord Chancellor), ie Scottish.
Therefore, I find I am suing the IT Adviser to the Lord Chief Justice, Professor Susskind, and I am exposing academically the top law report in England, the Woolf Report by Lord Woolf, the Lord Chief Justice. Oops!
You have in England/UK
The Queen
The Prime Minister
The Lord Chancellor (now Justice Secretary)
The Lord Chief Justice
The Vice Chancellor
The Master of the Rolls
Oops
Makes me a little bit special given I was originally a legal secretary of 17 years duration in Scotland and England, and then a fee earner paralegal of 3 years duration in S J Berwin & Co - where you get pay rises for doing no work, but no pay rise if your performance is 109% and profit costs £146k on a £120.00 charge out rate! That's Jewish for you! No something more sinister was occurring - Professor Richard Susskind's long corrupt arm of the law, which I can prove to a degree.
So now that Lord Woolf is outed and Professor Susskind is outed - what did the judiciary in England, or Scotland or Europe need with ADR in the judicial system and legal profession - what was necessary to be HIDDEN, or COVERED-UP - Justice is "PUBLIC", even arbitration still applies the rule of law privately!
WE WERE INVADED by a Japanese concept but directionally formulating from America and the Jewish people assisted by the Scots or is it vice versa!
Professor Richard Susskind OBE ("Professor DISobeDIENT") is Scottish. But he mistakenly believes that I am also Scottish, I was born in England, but have a Scottish accent and Scottish Father, William McDade.
Oops!
I have been covered up for 16 years for some reason: the judiciary and legal profession are knocked over, the Press - spin and are knocked over too, the military are knocked over - because I believe Iraq is a decoy because my research was known by 1997 and definitely by 1998/1999/2000/2001/2002 yet never made headlines - Professor Susskind holds public office, should have made front page when there is certain corruption in the Ministry of Justice or Lord Chancellor's Office - Lord Derry Irvine of Lairg did get sacked - why? Finally, awash with money and Clinton trips the financial sector finally goes down when Greenspan hits the shores of the UK - be it for good or bad reason: it was a short trip in any event, did not make for splash headlines, too quiet given he was head of the Federal Bank of America - did he stop for the lecture circuit!
Back to Scottish issues - this is a shocker:
(Taken from the backpage of a Historic Scotland publication Kings and Queens of Scotland by Colin Baxter)
*
Alpin
Kenneth I (843-859)
Constantin I (863-877)
Donald II (889-900)
Malcolm I (942-954)
Kenneth II ((971-995)
Malcolm II (1005-1034)
Bethoc
Duncan I (1034-1040)
Malcolm III (1058-1093)
David I (1124-1153)
Earl Henry
David
Margaret --------------and Isabella
Devorgilla -----------------Robert de Brus "The Competitor"
John Balliol (1292-1296) --Robert de Brus
Edward Balliol -----------Robert I (1306-1329) "The Bruce
--------------------------Marjorie
--------------------------Robert II (1371-1390)
--------------------------Robert III (1390-1406)
--------------------------James I (1406-1437)
--------------------------James II (1437-1460)
--------------------------James III (1460-1488)
--------------------------James IV (1488-1513)
--------------------------James V (1513-1542)
--------------------------Mary Queen of Scots (1542-1567)
--------------------------James VI and I (1567-1625)
--------------------------Charles I (1625-1649)
---------------Charles II (1649-85) and James VII & II (1685-89)
---------------------!--------------------------!
---------------William III (1689-1702)and Mary II ((1689-94)
(*this is a pedigree line for Balliol only)
The family of "Jermy" of Norfolk, England have a Pedigree from 1221 which establishes the family as "knights" from the 12th Century to the 17th Century.
Sir William Jermy 1221
Sir John Jermy m Marjery daughter of Roger Bigot Earl Marshall of England and his daughter married Thomas Bretherton son of Edward I
Sir John Jermy
Sir William Jermy married Ellin, daughter of King John Balliol, King of Scotland (1292-1306)
Sir John Jermy
Sir Thomas Jermy
Sir William Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir John Jermy
Sir Isaac Jermy
Sir Thomas Jermy
That is the Pedegree of the Scots but Queen Devorgilla of Galloway created "OXFORD UNIVERSITY" for the poor student - a veritable "Rose". King John Balliol was called "tomb tabard" or "empty surcoat". Was he defamed? Was Isabella green because her line did not succeed, but eventually did so via Robert The Bruce? Ellin was married to a Knight not a Royal House of Europe, she may have been furious and probably assisted the English King Edward II. Edward I had 20 children, Thomas Bretherton was the 17th child or brother No 2. Bizarrely, if you look at the Clan Crest Badges for Scotland, there is none for Canmore or Balliol, 13 challenged for the Crown under David I, but I do not know who the others were, but John Balliol was chosen over Robert the Brus (grandfather). It was whittled down to 6 of which Canmore, Bruce, Balliol were the top three. Balliol got it because Margaret was the oldest daughter. Isabella and Robert de Brus did they set out to defame Balliol - why is he empty surcoat?. Certainly the Clan badges do not form history of Scotland for Balliol AND Canmore (bizarrely) on modern maps !! (what was the Canmore issue), and the others? nor is there reference to a tartan for Canmore or Balliol in ancestry books on tartans at least none I am looking at?
Is this a real 12th Century Da Vinci Code?
My mother's name is Lesley Diane Jermy, she has a copy of the Jermy Pedegree only 300 were made - we know little else than that other than the Jermy lands were subject to an issue in Chancery by a bent judge who managed to secure them in the 17/18th centuries. The brief history of The Jermy Family of Norfolk and Suffolk shows the clan badge as a Griffen atop a helmet and shield with the lion rampart guardant with the message underneath "splendidum virtus insigne" on a ribbon. The book claims that all Jermy's of Norfolk are descendents and my mum was born in Norfolk. Amateur genealogy has thrown up a conundrum in the 17th century but .... I would like to know! Invitations to assist from historians with nothing to do OR perhaps a history graduate from Edinburgh University who may be out of a job soon!
Is this another "oops" which is causing a cover up of my court actions - technically I am English but have I been helping the wrong side.
Lord Mackay of Clashfern left comments on Hansard 18 December 1998 informing that history was being made: law is being made from the "Despatch Box" not the Woolsack. The issue is that the Queen enacted the Access to Justice Act 1999 BUT it does the opposite - Access from Justice. Moreover, the Masons/Susskind case and SJ Berwin & others cases going through the courts establishes the methodology:
law is not applied
law that is not applicable is applied
I await law is applied - I wrote to the courts yesterday again - they're not going to be ecstatic!
Concerning the Chilcot Inquiry my documents are ready to be inspected (a) history of the Woolf Reforms to the present day (b) legal cases for methodology not substance.
The Scotsman article on 19/02/10 by Eddie Barnes entitled "Gordon Brown: Saddam's defiance was real cause of Iraq War (Click Here)
posted by Lesley McDade at 1:23 pm
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home