Tuesday, January 28, 2025

I am 60 today


Whoo Hoo I am 60 today.  Had a long spa Weekend at the McDonald's Resort in Aviemore with my two sisters and two brothers.  The massage was wonderful.


WORK


Five past nine, late again
Bus, clock, slept in

Ten Past, breakfast
Cup of coffee, gasp.

Letter, deed, Oh what speed
Five o’clock approaching

Five past, please pretty please
Home time past.

Lesley McDade



To the King

Your Majesty, your son Prince Harry settled his case through mediation due to a coercion about costs.  He did not get Justice or the universality of the common good and we are left hoping their will now be criminal proceedings as a consequence of the report out of the mediation.  The mediation went on for longer than anticipated something a court cannot do.  But there has been a cover-up which means we are left wondering to what extent the court case would have revealed at the goings on in the media and who were the investigators involved and what punishment they would be given.  A Judgment would have meant case precedent would be established creating a ratio decidendi - judicial reasoning, and probably also obita dicta - persuasive arguments for the future direction of judges in case law. A Judgment would also have brought the law up-to-date.  Ah well. all in all I had hoped that Prince Harry would hold out for Justice but something has to be done about using costs as a means to defeat justice.


Thursday, January 16, 2025

Statutory Public Inquiry or Select Committee

I recently wrote to my MP Jamie Stone for him to get me either a public inquiry or a select committee.  Unfortunately, he claims to be unable to do so because he lacks professional knowledge and also lacks capacity and has suggested I do a Judicial Review.  I am now writing via him to others in Government to see if they can act on my behalf.  If there is a pro bono unit out there who could take up issues as a judicial review I would be grateful as I am unsure what this entails.

My email to Jamie Stone MP is as follows:

"I have given consideration tp the parliamentary procedures referred to below and I consider I would like a statutory public inquiry and for a government minister to ok my blog www.lesleymcdade.blogspot.com which details three miscarriages of justice (Lesley McDade v Masons and Lesley McDade v S J Berwin & Co x 2) and  my research on the Woolf Reforms which now apparently is implemented in Scotland.  Please can you refer me to an appropriate government minister to begin the process.


I do not want to do judicial review as apart from having no faith in the courts, I am a litigant in person and it has been 15 years since my last court appearance before Sir Robert Owen in February 2014.  I neither can afford the expense of instructing lawyers so would have to do it myself.  This would add an additional layer of bureaucracy when what is needed is now a political solution as events commenced in 1994 and took twenty years to get through three court cases and a mediation.  I have been lobbying politically re my research since 1997 when I wrote my dissertation on the Woolf Reforms which was awarded a grade of 2:1.  I have been lobbying for parliamentary sovereignty for 15 years since 2014 concerning my three miscarriages of justice hence my blog.

If I cannot get a statutory public inquiry then I would like a select committee which is important and in the public interest due to Professor Richard Susskind OBE sacking me who holds public office as IT Adviser to the Lord Chief Justice and promulgated mismanagement and his need to cover it up by getting his Counsel Bruce Carr to nobble the judge and bring the case forward by 6 months to do so.  I attach the response by Bruce Carr to a Bar Council complaint process in that regard.  Someone has removed his response from my blog.

It is hopefully my year this year and I am seeking an outcome of a new law - defamation by dismissal as a tort law and also a new law - corporate mismanagement as a criminal law along the lines of Swiss law and the Fifa case.  I am also seeking compensation that I would have received if my cases had been processed properly."