Corruption
On Friday I appeared before a Master of the Royal Courts on the action Lesley McDade v S J Berwin & Co, Julian Critchlow, Nicholas Carnell, Ian Insley.
The Master attempted to persuade me that a piece of statute law was relevant to me. I argued that it was not and gave the Master substantial reasons as to why it was not relevant.
The Master passed to me a piece of paper on which was written the words "no real prospect of success".
He then made an order refusing my application and refusing my right to appeal.
I now have a civil liberty issue in England & Wales as a consequence, but not in Scotland.
The act of passing me a piece of paper with the words above stated, establishes that this Master is corrupt - he cannot know my case has no prospect of success - if he fails to hear it.
I raised specifically with the Master a request for a declaration of his impartiality. I notified him of the reason why that request was necessary. He failed to declare impartiality or deal with the issue at all.
This particular judge has used procedural abuse on my case over a 4 year period.
Some of you met me outside the Courts passing out my blog details. I told the Master I would raise a stink, I suspect that come Monday morning the only thing the Master can do is resign.
I would also notify you that I am aware that my home and family are being monitored and that we are being "listened into" and that it is probably not MI5/MI6. Whilst I have had some fun, I am aware that Professors of Law are involved. I would also confirm that Masons, the law firm is "a sink estate" firm, I would also inform that S J Berwin is a veritable "cesspit". I do not need to lower the esteem of these firms or various legal professionals (not) they are clearly prepared to do so to themselves without any effort on my part. I am aware of who is doing the surveillance, I am also aware my emails are being monitored.
I therefore draw the conclusion that either this particular Master was coerced or ordered to behave in the manner above or that he is difficient in intellect. I consider it is more likely to be the former.
The Master can if he wishes issue me with a contempt of court order and thereby force the issue into the criminal courts, or he can request that the Home Secretary/Police investigate both cases properly.
I will of course give consideration to publishing the documents in the S J Berwin cases x 2 and also publishing the Bar Council complaints. You know who you are - res ipsa locquitor.
Of interest:
(Click Here) List of Documents in the Second Litigation discovered to Respondents' solicitors
(Click Here) List of Documents Respondents' solicitors provided to the court as an "agreed" court bundle (as abstracted)
(Click Here) List of Documents notified to the Court as having been abstracted by Respondents' solicitors which necessitated a "disagreed court bundle" + arguments in equity, ie in the interests of justice, the evidence be allowed to be produced by myself on the second day in court by 10.30 am next day
I did ask Chairperson Ryan for a contempt of court order be made upon Respondents/Respondents' solicitors/Counsel - never happened. Just what could they be trying to hide from the court!!! (I am obviously not trying to hide anything from the judge, and have played fair throughout). Chairperson Ryan subsequently took 9 months to release his Reserved Judgment (with noticeably a 42 day appeal timeframe just in time for "9/11" - was there a subliminal oblique message in there somewhere!
Needless to say, it has come as little / no surprise that Master Leslie has adopted the stance he has: there has to be a reason why the walls click in the living room and the bedroom and I experience "escotericism".
I have now issued appeal proceedings on the Civil Division of the Royal Courts of Justice and am awaiting a sealed copy of the court document. I have also notified the Police. (If anyone has a burning desire to see any of the documents contained in the Schedule of Documents above, please contact me as they are all a matter of public record now, however, I reserve the right to moderate requests, but will not turn down a reasonable request - you may appreciate I have a civil liberty issue (England only) as a consequence of these documents and the conduct of the people therein). The Third Litigation substantially utilises the same evidential data. (The performance figures are published on the Kangaroo Court post below).
Regards.
Lesley
The Master attempted to persuade me that a piece of statute law was relevant to me. I argued that it was not and gave the Master substantial reasons as to why it was not relevant.
The Master passed to me a piece of paper on which was written the words "no real prospect of success".
He then made an order refusing my application and refusing my right to appeal.
I now have a civil liberty issue in England & Wales as a consequence, but not in Scotland.
The act of passing me a piece of paper with the words above stated, establishes that this Master is corrupt - he cannot know my case has no prospect of success - if he fails to hear it.
I raised specifically with the Master a request for a declaration of his impartiality. I notified him of the reason why that request was necessary. He failed to declare impartiality or deal with the issue at all.
This particular judge has used procedural abuse on my case over a 4 year period.
Some of you met me outside the Courts passing out my blog details. I told the Master I would raise a stink, I suspect that come Monday morning the only thing the Master can do is resign.
I would also notify you that I am aware that my home and family are being monitored and that we are being "listened into" and that it is probably not MI5/MI6. Whilst I have had some fun, I am aware that Professors of Law are involved. I would also confirm that Masons, the law firm is "a sink estate" firm, I would also inform that S J Berwin is a veritable "cesspit". I do not need to lower the esteem of these firms or various legal professionals (not) they are clearly prepared to do so to themselves without any effort on my part. I am aware of who is doing the surveillance, I am also aware my emails are being monitored.
I therefore draw the conclusion that either this particular Master was coerced or ordered to behave in the manner above or that he is difficient in intellect. I consider it is more likely to be the former.
The Master can if he wishes issue me with a contempt of court order and thereby force the issue into the criminal courts, or he can request that the Home Secretary/Police investigate both cases properly.
I will of course give consideration to publishing the documents in the S J Berwin cases x 2 and also publishing the Bar Council complaints. You know who you are - res ipsa locquitor.
Of interest:
(Click Here) List of Documents in the Second Litigation discovered to Respondents' solicitors
(Click Here) List of Documents Respondents' solicitors provided to the court as an "agreed" court bundle (as abstracted)
(Click Here) List of Documents notified to the Court as having been abstracted by Respondents' solicitors which necessitated a "disagreed court bundle" + arguments in equity, ie in the interests of justice, the evidence be allowed to be produced by myself on the second day in court by 10.30 am next day
I did ask Chairperson Ryan for a contempt of court order be made upon Respondents/Respondents' solicitors/Counsel - never happened. Just what could they be trying to hide from the court!!! (I am obviously not trying to hide anything from the judge, and have played fair throughout). Chairperson Ryan subsequently took 9 months to release his Reserved Judgment (with noticeably a 42 day appeal timeframe just in time for "9/11" - was there a subliminal oblique message in there somewhere!
Needless to say, it has come as little / no surprise that Master Leslie has adopted the stance he has: there has to be a reason why the walls click in the living room and the bedroom and I experience "escotericism".
I have now issued appeal proceedings on the Civil Division of the Royal Courts of Justice and am awaiting a sealed copy of the court document. I have also notified the Police. (If anyone has a burning desire to see any of the documents contained in the Schedule of Documents above, please contact me as they are all a matter of public record now, however, I reserve the right to moderate requests, but will not turn down a reasonable request - you may appreciate I have a civil liberty issue (England only) as a consequence of these documents and the conduct of the people therein). The Third Litigation substantially utilises the same evidential data. (The performance figures are published on the Kangaroo Court post below).
Regards.
Lesley
posted by Lesley McDade at 9:18 am
4 comments
